With all reforestation projects, there's a need to set Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-bound (SMART) objectives. Often, projects use historic conditions to set these objectives and measure success.

However, as the climate changes, there's great uncertainty about what a future ecosystem will look like. Objectives therefore need to be adaptive and focused on the resilience of specific ecosystem functions — such as pollination, water quality or biodiversity. 

For example, at the UK's Mayesbrook Climate Change Park, 45 hectares were restored with the primary objective of helping a community adapt to flooding risk, exemplifying how urban green space could provide key ecosystem services.

The suitability of sites for reforestation will change as environmental conditions alter, as species move to avoid climate impacts, and as the intensity of drought, storms and floods worsens.

When identifying potential sites, it's important to consider the anticipated climatic changes in that area. This includes the response of species, their vulnerability and exposure to threats, and the space available for them to move.

For example, in Brazil's Atlantic Forest, extensive work has been completed to select restoration sites based on modeling of climate change, land use change and socio-economic factors. Furthermore, in order to increase the probability of achieving positive outcomes, reducing the drivers of habitat degradation is imperative before commencing reforestation.

The projected impacts of climate change will force us to ask difficult questions about which species to choose for reforestation and which ecosystems we wish to regenerate. In extreme cases, reforestation may need to consider replacing native species that are vulnerable to climate change with non-native species that are able to fulfill the same ecosystem function. Sourcing seed from adjacent to project sites or using local material may no longer be adequate in many regions, as it could be poorly adapted to future climates.

Instead, at least part of the material for reforestation may need to be sourced from plants that are already adapted, and able to survive extreme drought, wildfires, increased temperatures and reduced rainfall. Existing strategies such as climate adjusted provenance can aid practitioners to better select stock that is able to survive climate change. 

Climatic changes have the potential to significantly impact the functioning of ecosystems. For example, in some areas, we're already seeing a mismatch between plant flowering events and the emergence or arrival of key pollinators like birds, butterflies and bees. Reforestation will need to consider when and where the loss of critical species interactions and ecosystem functions may occur in the future. Extreme measures like engineering approaches or species reintroductions may be required to fill the roles of keystone species lost due to climate change impacts like floods and wildfires.

The Vietnamese Coastal Wetlands Protection and Development Project (CWPDP) utilized both physical manipulation and species selection when restoring mangrove forests in southern Vietnam: plantations were specifically designed to be species-rich, providing genetic variety. Building dykes and bamboo fences also allowed for the natural rehabilitation of mangroves, in areas impacted by sea level rise.

Many threats to natural environments are directly related to climate change, including more intense and frequent extreme weather events and increasing sea surface temperatures. Other threats are the result of tangible human actions like increased nutrient input from agriculture — and still others are the result of direct actions that are further exacerbated by climate change, including invasive species, pests and the spread of disease.

For instance, Whitebark pine forests have suffered major declines as a result of outbreaks of mountain pine beetle and the exotic disease white pine blister rust. Projected future warming and drying may increase the distribution of these outbreaks, further exacerbating Whitebark pine decline and compromising the success of restoration. Planting rust-resistant Whitebark pine seedlings is one recommended mitigation measure being investigated to combat this trend.

These global hazards can have local, site-specific impacts and must be considered during planning to enhance the resilience of restoration projects. While certain risks may be minimized using the approaches outlined elsewhere in this framework, some might be difficult to abate. Potential impacts should be anticipated and mitigated within the design and implementation of each project.

Policies, land use and Indigenous Communities and Local People (IPLCs) may be affected by climate change in ways which influence the feasibility of reforestation. Reforestation may be incentivized by climate change policies and mechanisms (e.g. carbon offset markets), but in some cases discouraged, as when increased demand for biofuels raises competition for land.

Understanding how climate change will impact stakeholders and alter land management is key to reforestation success. Adoption of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and clear legal right is critical to ensure that projects align with long-term socioeconomic outcomes. 

Collaboration will be key to working across landscapes and achieving multiple objectives. The Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact is a collection of the efforts of many smaller organizations to restore parts of the Atlantic Forest in Brazil. Included the Pact is a covenant where signatories define their priorities, including sharing knowledge on forest restoration, providing advice to align   restoration actions, and contributing to public policy. Through this Pact, smaller local restoration projects create greater impact by aligning their actions. 

In a rapidly changing climate, reforestation management decisions may be valid for only short time periods. For this reason, monitoring and adaptive management of restoration projects is key to ensuring their success. This requires clearly stated, attainable objectives supported by appropriate indicators, sufficient monitoring resources, and solid implementation plans.

At the Stewart Lake Waterfowl Management Area in northeastern Utah, restoration work aimed to reduce hazardous selenium contamination by careful water inflow/outflow control. This was sensitive to decreased river flow and increased risk of drought, as predicted by climate change models. The management was designed to be adaptive. Data collected from monitoring water, sediment, plankton and fish selenium levels were used at regular stakeholder meetings to evaluate and refine the restoration strategy.